Who we are: the evidence

Given the audience, the site is itself an intervention and needs crisis-resource placement, no-diagnosis language, and a stated policy on covering participants

Constrained by VOC-006

Argued here, not reported from a source.

• depends on VOC-006 — Community norms constrain how care is expressed

The Human Line Project runs a peer support community on Discord for people who have spiralled and for their friends and family, reporting around 250 active members, eight moderators and more than 500 people helped

Grew out of a Reddit chatroom and moved when it outgrew it. Covered by NPR in January 2026 and Slate in February. The single most concrete referral this site can make.

NPR, The support group helping people after AI delusions, January 2026 re-check 2027-09-05

• supports PSY-030 — Human company as the counter to isolation
• holds up DTY-003 — Something now exists to point at

Peer support specific to this did not exist when the accounts recorded here were lived, and does now

Worth stating plainly because the honest answer to where do I go used to be nowhere. That changed in the space of about a year.

The Human Line Project, peer support community for people affected by AI chatbot spirals

• depends on DTY-002 — Something now exists to point at
• supported by DTY-004 — The population needing it is broader than crisis

Support groups report members losing jobs, relationships and savings, so the population reaching them is not only people in acute crisis

The aftermath is longer and more ordinary than the crisis framing suggests, and the people in it need something other than a hotline.

Slate, on AI psychosis support groups and reported losses of jobs, relationships and savings, February 2026 re-check 2027-09-05

• supports DTY-003 — The population needing it is broader than crisis